International Journal of Research and Reports in Gynaecology

Contraceptive Decision-making: A Mini Review

Iin Fadhilah Utami Tammasse *

University of Bristol, UK.

*Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

---

Abstract

This mini-review article provides a comprehensive overview of contraceptive decision-making, starting with categorizing contraceptive methods into three main groups: long-acting reversible contraceptives, methods that require consistent usage, and permanent contraception options. The article emphasizes the importance of effective counseling, which includes providing comprehensive information on all available methods, such as efficacy, advantages, disadvantages, application procedures, practicality, duration, potential side effects, and when to seek help, while respecting individual beliefs and preferences. The review highlights Long-Acting Reversible Contraception (LARC) and Female Sterilization as two methods that require fewer administrations and presents alternative options like vasectomy. Informed consent and the assessment of potential regret predictors are highlighted as crucial steps in the decision-making process. The UK Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use (UKMEC) is discussed as a tool for tailored recommendations according to age and conditions. The review encourages a nonjudgmental, patient-centered approach to ensure informed choices and patient autonomy. It emphasizes the importance of considering various factors such as medical history, socioeconomic status, and sociocultural practices. The article also discusses the potential non-contraceptive benefits of certain methods and highlights the importance of not pressuring women to choose LARC over female sterilization. Overall, this mini-review article provides a holistic understanding of contraceptive decision-making and offers insights into the benefits and considerations of different methods.

Keywords: Contraceptive, LARC, IUD, decision making

---

---

---

References

NICE Guideline. (n.d.).

UK medical eligibility criteria; 2006. Available:www.fsrh.org

Hoopes AJ, Teal SB, Akers AY, Sheeder J. Low acceptability of certain contraceptive methods among young women. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology. 2018;31(3):274–280. Available:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2017.11.008

Inthavong S, Pantasri T, Morakote N, Muangmool T, Piyamongkol W, Pongsatha S, Chaovisitseree S. Change of contraceptive preference after the free-LARC program for Thai teenagers. BMC Women’s Health. 2022;22(1). Available:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-022-01797-9

Faculty of Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare Clinical Guidance Contraceptive Choices for Young People; 2010.

Faculty of Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare Clinical Guidance Male and Female Sterilisation Document reference number Title Author/publisher Publication date; 2014. Available:www.nice.org.uk/accreditation.

Bravata G, Patel DR, Omar HA. Long-acting reversible contraception for adolescents. In Pediatric Medicine. AME Publishing Company. 2019;2. Available:https://doi.org/10.21037/pm.2019.07.10

Tibaijuka L, Odongo R, Welikhe E, Mukisa W, Kugonza L, Busingye I, Nabukalu P, Ngonzi J, Asiimwe SB, Bajunirwe F. Factors influencing use of long-acting versus short-acting contraceptive methods among reproductive-age women in a resource-limited setting. BMC Women’s Health. 2017; 17(1). Available:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-017-0382-2

Title Contraception After Pregnancy Author/ publisher Faculty of Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare Detail of changes to original guidance document. (n.d.). Available:https://www.fsrh.org/standards-and-guidance/documents/contraception-after-

Parsons AD. Sterilisation. Practitioner. 1985;229(1403):449–451. Available:https://doi.org/10.1177/1755738020964525