Female Genital Mutilation: A Dehumanizing Practice against Womanhood in Nigeria
International Journal of Research and Reports in Gynaecology,
Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) is a dehumanizing cultural practice, depriving women of sexual satisfaction and freedom; and the right to decide what happens to their body qualifying it a public health issue globally. The aim of this article is to examine the practice of female genital mutilation in Nigeria through review of empirical studies related to the meaning, types, prevalence, justifications for FGM, complication and elimination of FGM in Nigeria and globally. Articles related to FGM were reviewed. Nigeria has a 25% prevalence rate among women of childbearing age (15 – 45), accounting for one-quarter of the estimated 200 million globally. Its prevalence among geopolitical zones and states varies with types in Osun state (77%), Ebonyi (74%), Ekiti (72%), Imo (68%), Lagos (45%), Kaduna (34%), Kano (13%) and Katsina (0.1%). Types I and II are practiced in the south–south while types III and IV are practiced in the Northern zone. Justification for the practice of FGM include hygiene and aesthetics, initiation into womanhood, acceptability for marriage, control of female sexuality, increased sexual satisfaction for men, and culture. World conferences and summits have been held in the past which re-affirm human rights and call upon governments to strive for their full respect, protection and fulfilment. However, it still persists to some degree in some communities as implementation of laws still pose problems. The royal fathers, chiefs, elders in the communities as custodians of the culture and tradition of the people should be educated on the complications of the practice and its implication on the right of women and girls. Aggressive health education campaigns should be carried out through various media houses and social media such as twitter, facebook, Instagram and Whatsapp. All hands should be on deck to keep pushing for a total ban on Female Genital Mutilation (FGM).
- Female genital mutilation
- dehumanizing practice
How to Cite
Abdulcadir J, Margairaz C, Boulvain M, Irion O. Care of women with female genital mutilation/cutting. Schweizerische Medizinische Wochenschrift. 2011;140: w13137.
Aikman P. Female genital mutilation: Human rights abuse or protected cultural practice? 2012.
WHO. Sexual and reproductive health. Female Genital Mutilation. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.
Ayenigbara GO, Aina SI, Famakin TD. Female genital mutilation: Types, consequences and constraints of its eradication in Nigeria. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences. 2013;3(5):7-10.
Tukur J, Jido TA, Uzoho CC. The contribution of gishiri cut to vesicovaginal fistula in Birnin Kudu, Northern Nigeria. African Journal of Urology. 2006;12:121-125.
Muteshi JK, Suellen M, José MB. The ongoing violence against women: Female genital mutilation/cutting. Reproductive Health. 2016;13:44.
Asekun-Olarinmoye EO, Amusan OA. The impact of health education on attitudes towards female genital mutilation (FGM) in a rural Nigerian community. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2008;13:289-297.
Daniyan B, Ekwedigwe K, Sunday-Adeoye I, Yakubu E, Uguru S, Danladi D. Review of the practice of female genital mutilation in Nigeria. Epidemiology (Sunnyvale). 2018;8:356.
UNICEF. Female genital mutilation/cutting: A global concern [Internet]. New York: UNICEF; 2016.
[Accessed 2017 Jan 18]
Ahanonu E, Victor O. Mother’s perceptions of female genital mutilation. Health Education Research. 2014;29:683-689.
Epundu UU, Iika AL, Ibe CC, Nwabueze AS, Emelumadu OF, Nnebue CC. The epidemiology of female genital mutilation in Nigeria: A twelve year review. Afrimedic Journal. 2018;6(1):1-10.
Nigeria Demographic Health Survey. UNICEF Nigeria; 2013.
Akingboye O. Female genital mutilation still a big threat to Nigerian girl-child survival, development. The Guardian; 2018.
(Accessed January, 2020)
Saraçoglu M, Öztür H. Female circumcision. Andrology and Gynecology: Current Research. 2014;2:2.
Bodunrin HO. Female genital mutilation: Perceptions and beliefs in a Nigerian Rural Community. African Anthropology. 1999;6(1):72-81.
Johansen REB. Virility, pleasure and female genital mutilation/cutting. A qualitative study of perceptions and experiences of medicalized defibulation among Somali and Sudanese migrants in Norway. Reproductive Health. 2017;14: 25.
Okeke TC, Anyaehie USB, Ezenyeaku CCK. An overview of female genital mutilation in Nigeria. Annals of Medical and Health Sciences Research. 2012;2(1):21-29.
Odukogbe AA, Afolabi BB, Bello OO, Adeyanju A. Female genital mutilation/cutting in Africa. Trans Adrol Urol. 2017;6(2):138-148.
Dibua VA, Agweda TO, Eromonsele AO. The practice of female genital mutilation in Esan Land of Edo State, Nigeria: A sociological analysis. Journal of Sociology, Psychology and Anthropology in Practice: Int’l Perspective. 2010;2:1-3.
Nour NM. Female genital mutilation: A persisting practice. Reviews in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2008;1(3):135-139.
Garba ID, Muhammed Z, Abubakar IS, Yakasai I. Prevalence of female genital mutilation among female infants in Kani, Northern Nigeria. Archives of Gynecology. 2012;286:423-428.
Mberu BU. Female genital mutilation/cutting in Nigeria: A scoping review African population and health research centre. Evidence to End FGM/C: Research to Help Women Thrive. New York: Population Council; 2017.
(Accessed 3 September 2019)
Abdulcadir J, Jean-Christophe T, Patrick P. Management of painful clitoral neuroma after female genital mutilation/cutting. Reproductive Health. 2017;14:22.
Mwanri L, Gatwiri GJ. Injured bodies, damaged lives: Experiences and narratives of Kenyan women with obstetric fistula and female genital mutilation/cutting. Reproductive Health; 2017.
Abdel-Azim S. Psychosocial and sexual aspects of female circumcision. African Journal of Urology. 2013;19(3):141-142.
OHCHR, UNDP, UNESCO. Eliminating female genital mutilation. An interagency statement. Geneva: WHO; 2008.
Abstract View: 1021 times
PDF Download: 880 times